Health Insurance Industry
Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Massachusetts offers a variety of health care options for a family of three or four. The cheapest is a PPO at a monthly cost of $1202.19. The cost translates into the neighborhood of $300.55 a week. The Boston Globe recently reported Mr. Cleve Killingsworth, the CEO of Blue Contemptible of MA; enjoyed an annual salary for 2007 of 3.5 million, or, $67,307.69 a week. It would capture in the neighborhood of 224 families paying weekly premiums of $300 unprejudiced to veil the cost of one employee of Blue Nasty Blue Shield of MA. Needless to say, not a penny of these 224 families hard earned money applies to healthcare, although in all fairness to the insurance industry, this is indeed a healthcare cost.
This week of Mid-October 2009, the health care industry is embarking on a campaign designed to ruin any worry to nationalize heath care reform in the United States. The health care industry is insisting any nationalized thought will raise the cost of monthly premiums by thousands of dollars and the health care industry may be upright, but for those who can’t afford health care as it now stands, increased costs don’t mean anything. Simple economics dictates if the mark goes up on something you can’t afford to start with, purchasing the item remains out of the seek information from. If, however, you have the purchasing power for such an item, the last thing you want is an increase in its designate. So, is the health industry campaigning to protect those subscribers they already have, or, trying to protect CEO’s who form $67,307.69 a week?
CEO’s like Mr. Killingsworth are actually in very miserable positions. Owned by companies that offer stocks to investors and controlled by boards of directors demanding increased returns on those investments, Mr. Killingworth is caught between satisfying those in a region to encourage him of a very cozy job and the publics perception of a health insurers responsibility to Americans, insured with the company, or, not insured at all. It must be quite a balancing act, especially in times when a President demands coverage for all Americans.
Americans are fortunate with respect to the fact we can determine between public schools and private schools. Those who can afford to send their children to private schools do and those that cannot consume public schools. A public health option is not going to extinguish health insurance, as we know it. Those with private policies will support them and those with no policies can flock to public offerings. Will they be as superb as those services provided in the private sector? Probably not, but the burden the uninsured region on the health industry as a whole will lead to a rising cost of premiums, affordable to less and less of the public. When was the last time you paid less for health insurance?
When John Doe dials 911 because he is suffering a heart attack, emergency operators don’t waist time querying the caller about his insurance coverage. Emergency operators ascertain the dwelling of the individual and dispatch EMTs to the region. EMTs fight to maintain life while transporting to a hospital. If John Doe is insured, everyone (with the possible exception of the insurance company) breathes a content of relief. If he is not, he is a burden on society. He becomes a social cost. 911 operators as well as the Emergency Medical Techs they dispatch, operate at a cost to society. They appreciate salaries and benefits dependent upon tax revenues. A nation of insured individuals will close the growing loss of funds related to the health industry at gargantuan. Public hospitals cannot rush at zero profit. Uninsured people don’t do regular check-ups giving diseases every opportunity to grow and attack society as a whole. There is no reason to horror a change in the method we insure our neighbors. As it stands, the health insurance industry is headed down a road of self-destruction in a futile attempt at self-preservation. Boards of Directors clinging to troubled profits and CEO’s trying to account for a weekly income matching the weekly premiums of how many families? Affordable health care for all, could translate into health industry profit and growth. If it doesn’t, then shame on us for attempting to fix a spot, but that is what American’s do. They build every anguish to improve. Most of the time we actually succeed. Sometimes, we fail along the plan but in the slay the only arrangement out of this mess is to change it. Give the nay-sayers the opportunity to say, “I told you so.” Maybe that’s what it’ll choose for us to stand united and fix this thing, after all.
Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Massachusetts offers a variety of health care options for a family of three or four. The cheapest is a PPO at a monthly cost of $1202.19. The cost translates into the neighborhood of $300.55 a week. The Boston Globe recently reported Mr. Cleve Killingsworth, the CEO of Blue Unpleasant of MA; enjoyed an annual salary for 2007 of 3.5 million, or, $67,307.69 a week. It would hold in the neighborhood of 224 families paying weekly premiums of $300 honest to shroud the cost of one employee of Blue Detestable Blue Shield of MA. Needless to say, not a penny of these 224 families hard earned money applies to healthcare, although in all fairness to the insurance industry, this is indeed a healthcare cost.
This week of Mid-October 2009, the health care industry is embarking on a campaign designed to demolish any wretchedness to nationalize heath care reform in the United States. The health care industry is insisting any nationalized conception will raise the cost of monthly premiums by thousands of dollars and the health care industry may be honest, but for those who can’t afford health care as it now stands, increased costs don’t mean anything. Simple economics dictates if the stamp goes up on something you can’t afford to initiate with, purchasing the item remains out of the inquire of. If, however, you have the purchasing power for such an item, the last thing you want is an increase in its notice. So, is the health industry campaigning to protect those subscribers they already have, or, trying to protect CEO’s who beget $67,307.69 a week?
CEO’s like Mr. Killingsworth are actually in very dismal positions. Owned by companies that offer stocks to investors and controlled by boards of directors demanding increased returns on those investments, Mr. Killingworth is caught between satisfying those in a site to succor him of a very cozy job and the publics perception of a health insurers responsibility to Americans, insured with the company, or, not insured at all. It must be quite a balancing act, especially in times when a President demands coverage for all Americans.
Americans are fortunate with respect to the fact we can decide between public schools and private schools. Those who can afford to send their children to private schools do and those that cannot utilize public schools. A public health option is not going to kill health insurance, as we know it. Those with private policies will withhold them and those with no policies can flock to public offerings. Will they be as favorable as those services provided in the private sector? Probably not, but the burden the uninsured site on the health industry as a whole will lead to a rising cost of premiums, affordable to less and less of the public. When was the last time you paid less for health insurance?
When John Doe dials 911 because he is suffering a heart attack, emergency operators don’t waist time querying the caller about his insurance coverage. Emergency operators ascertain the residence of the individual and dispatch EMTs to the spot. EMTs fight to keep life while transporting to a hospital. If John Doe is insured, everyone (with the possible exception of the insurance company) breathes a sing of relief. If he is not, he is a burden on society. He becomes a social cost. 911 operators as well as the Emergency Medical Techs they dispatch, operate at a cost to society. They be pleased salaries and benefits dependent upon tax revenues. A nation of insured individuals will halt the growing loss of funds related to the health industry at gargantuan. Public hospitals cannot rush at zero profit. Uninsured people don’t do regular check-ups giving diseases every opportunity to grow and attack society as a whole. There is no reason to terror a change in the device we insure our neighbors. As it stands, the health insurance industry is headed down a road of self-destruction in a futile attempt at self-preservation. Boards of Directors clinging to terrified profits and CEO’s trying to explain a weekly income matching the weekly premiums of how many families? Affordable health care for all, could translate into health industry profit and growth. If it doesn’t, then shame on us for attempting to fix a spot, but that is what American’s do. They accomplish every wretchedness to improve. Most of the time we actually succeed. Sometimes, we fail along the contrivance but in the extinguish the only draw out of this mess is to change it. Give the nay-sayers the opportunity to say, “I told you so.” Maybe that’s what it’ll retract for us to stand united and fix this thing, after all.
Tagged with: aetna individual health insurance • Individual Health Insurance • individual health insurance coverage • individual health insurance rates
Filed under: Individual Health Insurance
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Leave a Reply